Reasoning Module

from semantica.reasoning import Reasoner, Rule, RuleType

reasoner = Reasoner()

# Add facts as strings in predicate(args) form
reasoner.add_fact("Manager(Alice)")
reasoner.add_fact("Employee(Alice)")

# Add an IF-THEN rule using the string form
reasoner.add_rule("IF Manager(?x) THEN HasAuthority(?x)")

# Run forward chaining: returns List[InferenceResult]
results = reasoner.forward_chain()
for r in results:
    print(r.conclusion)         # "HasAuthority(Alice)"
    print(r.confidence)         # 1.0
    if r.rule_used:
        print(r.rule_used.name) # name of the rule applied

from semantica.reasoning import Rule, RuleType

rule = Rule(
    rule_id="rule_001",
    name="manager_authority",
    conditions=["Manager(?x)"],
    conclusion="HasAuthority(?x)",
    rule_type=RuleType.IMPLICATION,
    confidence=0.9,
)
reasoner.add_rule(rule)

from semantica.reasoning import Reasoner, Rule, RuleType, InferenceResult

reasoner = Reasoner()

# Facts can be strings, KG entity dicts, or KG relationship dicts
reasoner.add_fact("Manager(John)")
reasoner.add_fact("Employee(John)")

# IF-THEN string form
reasoner.add_rule("IF Manager(?x) AND Employee(?x) THEN SeniorStaff(?x)")

# Forward chaining: iterates until fixpoint
results = reasoner.forward_chain()
for r in results:
    print(r.conclusion)   # e.g. "SeniorStaff(John)"
    print(r.premises)     # list of premise strings matched
    print(r.confidence)   # float

# Backward chaining: prove a specific goal
result = reasoner.backward_chain("SeniorStaff(John)", max_depth=10)
if result:
    print(f"Proven: {result.conclusion}")
    print(f"Premises: {result.premises}")

# infer_facts() loads facts and rules in one call, returns conclusion strings
conclusions = reasoner.infer_facts(
    facts=["Manager(Alice)", "Employee(Alice)"],
    rules=["IF Manager(?x) THEN HasAuthority(?x)"],
)
# → ["HasAuthority(Alice)"]

from semantica.reasoning import Rule, Fact, RuleType

# Rule: all fields
rule = Rule(
    rule_id="rule_001",            # required: unique identifier
    name="manager_authority",      # required: display name
    conditions=["Manager(?x)"],    # list of condition strings
    conclusion="HasAuthority(?x)", # conclusion string
    rule_type=RuleType.IMPLICATION, # IMPLICATION | EQUIVALENCE | CONSTRAINT | TRANSFORMATION
    confidence=1.0,                 # default 1.0
    priority=0,                     # higher priority rules run first
)

# Fact: for working with the Rete engine directly
from semantica.reasoning import Fact
fact = Fact(
    fact_id="f001",                # required: unique identifier
    predicate="Manager",
    arguments=["John"],
    metadata={},
)

from semantica.reasoning import GraphReasoner

# Initialize: uses openai by default; override via kwargs
reasoner = GraphReasoner(provider="openai", model="gpt-4o-mini")

kg = {
    "entities": [
        {"id": "alice",   "name": "Alice",   "type": "Person",       "properties": {"role": "CEO"}},
        {"id": "acme",    "name": "Acme Inc", "type": "Organization"},
    ],
    "relationships": [
        {"source": "alice", "target": "acme", "type": "leads"}
    ],
}

answer: str = reasoner.reason(
    graph=kg,
    query="Who leads Acme Inc. and what is their role?"
)
print(answer)

from semantica.reasoning import ReteEngine, Rule, Fact, RuleType

engine = ReteEngine()

# Build the Rete network from a list of Rule objects
rules = [
    Rule(
        rule_id="r1",
        name="manager_authority",
        conditions=["Manager(?x)"],
        conclusion="HasAuthority(?x)",
    )
]
engine.build_network(rules)

# Add facts to working memory
engine.add_fact(Fact(fact_id="f1", predicate="Manager", arguments=["Alice"]))

# Match patterns and execute
matches = engine.match_patterns()
results = engine.execute_matches(matches)
# results is a list of conclusion values from matched rules

# Network statistics
stats = engine.get_network_stats()
# → {"total_nodes": N, "alpha_nodes": A, "beta_nodes": B, "terminal_nodes": T, "facts": F}

engine.reset()

from semantica.reasoning import SPARQLReasoner

reasoner = SPARQLReasoner()

# Add an inference rule (IF-THEN string form)
reasoner.add_inference_rule("IF is_a(?x, Manager) THEN has_authority(?x)")

# Execute a query: returns SPARQLQueryResult
result = reasoner.execute_query("""
    PREFIX ex: <http://example.org/>
    SELECT ?person ?company WHERE {
        ?person ex:founded ?company .
        ?company ex:located_in ex:SiliconValley .
    }
""")

for row in result.bindings:
    print(row)   # each row is a dict of variable → {"value": ..., "type": ...}

# Expand a query with inference rules (returns modified query string)
expanded = reasoner.expand_query("SELECT ?x WHERE { ?x a :Manager }")

# Infer additional bindings from existing results
enriched = reasoner.infer_results(result)

SPARQLReasoner(
    config=None,         # optional config dict
    triplet_store=None,  # optional TripletStore instance for live query execution
    enable_inference=True,
)

from semantica.reasoning import DatalogReasoner, DatalogFact

datalog = DatalogReasoner()

# Add base facts: string form is the simplest
datalog.add_fact("parent(alice, bob)")
datalog.add_fact("parent(bob, charlie)")

# Or use DatalogFact directly (args is a tuple of strings)
datalog.add_fact(DatalogFact(predicate="parent", args=("charlie", "dave")))

# Add recursive rules using Horn clause syntax
datalog.add_rule("ancestor(X, Y) :- parent(X, Y).")
datalog.add_rule("ancestor(X, Z) :- parent(X, Y), ancestor(Y, Z).")

# Evaluate to fixpoint: returns all derived fact strings
all_facts = datalog.derive_all()
# e.g. ["parent(alice, bob)", "parent(bob, charlie)", ..., "ancestor(alice, bob)", ...]

# Query with variable pattern: variables start with uppercase or ?
results = datalog.query("ancestor(alice, ?Z)")
# → [{"Z": "bob"}, {"Z": "charlie"}, {"Z": "dave"}]

# Clear and start over
datalog.clear()

from semantica.reasoning import DatalogFact, DatalogRule

# DatalogFact: ground fact; args must all be constants (lowercase start)
fact = DatalogFact(predicate="parent", args=("alice", "bob"))

# DatalogRule: parsed from string; head and body are set by the parser
# Use add_rule("head(X, Y) :- body(X, Z), body2(Z, Y)."): do not construct directly

from datetime import datetime
from semantica.reasoning import TemporalReasoningEngine, TemporalInterval, IntervalRelation

engine = TemporalReasoningEngine()

ceo_tenure   = TemporalInterval(start=datetime(1997, 9, 16), end=datetime(2011, 8, 24))
board_member = TemporalInterval(start=datetime(2000, 1,  1), end=datetime(2012, 6,  1))

# Compute Allen relation: method is relation(), not get_relation()
rel = engine.relation(ceo_tenure, board_member)
# → IntervalRelation.DURING  (ceo_tenure is fully inside board_member)

# Other helpers
engine.overlaps(ceo_tenure, board_member)   # bool
engine.contains(board_member, ceo_tenure)   # bool

# Is a given point in time inside an interval?
engine.active_at(ceo_tenure, datetime(2005, 6, 1))   # True

from semantica.reasoning import ExplanationGenerator, Reasoner, Rule

reasoner = Reasoner()
reasoner.add_fact("Manager(John)")
reasoner.add_rule("IF Manager(?x) THEN HasAuthority(?x)")
results = reasoner.forward_chain()

# ExplanationGenerator takes no positional args
generator = ExplanationGenerator()

# Pass an InferenceResult object: not a dict
explanation = generator.generate_explanation(results[0])

print(f"Type:       {explanation.explanation_type}")   # "inference"
print(f"Conclusion: {explanation.conclusion}")
print(f"NL:         {explanation.natural_language}")

if explanation.reasoning_path:
    for step in explanation.reasoning_path.steps:
        print(f"  Step {step.step_id}: {step.description}")
        if step.rule_applied:
            print(f"    Rule: {step.rule_applied.name}")

# Justify a conclusion with a reasoning path
path = generator.show_reasoning_path(results[0])
justification = generator.justify_conclusion(results[0].conclusion, path)
print(justification.explanation_text)

# Explanation
explanation.explanation_id    # str
explanation.explanation_type  # "inference" | "proof" | "abductive" | "generic"
explanation.conclusion        # conclusion value
explanation.reasoning_path    # ReasoningPath | None
explanation.natural_language  # NL string (when generate_nl=True, the default)

# ReasoningStep
step.step_id        # str
step.description    # str
step.rule_applied   # Rule | None  (NOT rule_name)
step.input_facts    # List[Any]
step.output_fact    # Any
step.confidence     # float